How can you prioritize user stories based on the cost of delay?
Learn from the community’s knowledge. Experts are adding insights into this AI-powered collaborative article, and you could too.
This is a new type of article that we started with the help of AI, and experts are taking it forward by sharing their thoughts directly into each section.
If you’d like to contribute, request an invite by liking or reacting to this article. Learn more
— The LinkedIn Team
User stories are short descriptions of features or functionalities that deliver value to the end users or customers of a product or service. As an agile practitioner, you need to prioritize user stories based on their importance, urgency, and impact. One way to do that is to use the cost of delay, which is a measure of how much value is lost or foregone by delaying or not delivering a user story.
Cost of delay is the economic opportunity cost of not delivering a user story on time. It reflects the value that the user story would generate over time if it was delivered now, compared to the value that it would generate if it was delivered later. Cost of delay can be expressed in monetary terms, such as revenue, profit, or customer satisfaction, or in non-monetary terms, such as user engagement, retention, or loyalty.
-
Sagar Shah PMP®
Technology Evangelist | IT Consultant | Agile Mentor | Solution Architecture | Digital Transformation | Prompt Engineering | SAFe - Scaled Agile Framework | Pre-Sales Consultant | RFP Specialist | 10K+ Followers
Prioritize user stories based on the cost of delay by evaluating the impact of delayed delivery on overall project objectives. Consider factors such as potential revenue loss, customer satisfaction, and strategic importance. Assign a cost of delay value to each user story, enabling the team to prioritize work that minimizes overall cost of delay and maximizes business value. This approach ensures that the most impactful stories are addressed promptly.
-
Brendan Broderick
Human-Centric Product Leader ⇨ Transformation & Change Management | Drive relentless improvement initiatives to empower financial equality and inclusivity
Cost of delay quantifies the negative impact of delaying a project or decision. It represents the financial or strategic cost incurred due to not delivering a product, service, or feature in a timely manner. This cost can include lost revenue, increased expenses, missed opportunities, and reduced customer satisfaction. Calculating the cost of delay helps leaders prioritize tasks and make more informed choices about which projects or features to work on first.
To calculate cost of delay, you need to estimate two factors: the value profile and the delay sensitivity of each user story. The value profile is the curve that shows how the value of the user story changes over time. For example, some user stories may have a high initial value that declines rapidly, while others may have a low initial value that increases gradually. The delay sensitivity is the rate at which the value of the user story decreases as time passes. For example, some user stories may be time-critical, meaning that their value drops significantly with every day of delay, while others may be time-insensitive, meaning that their value remains stable or even increases with delay.
-
Arunav Tiwari
Product | AI/ML | IoT | AR/XR | The Product Folks
At Physicswallah, our co-founder would always say, "The future of a child is in our hands today." Similarly, in product management, the future of our product is in the stories we prioritise today. It's always Value Over Time: Sketch out the value journey of each user story over time—some sprint out of the gate while others gain worth at a marathoner's pace. Gauge their urgency and Quantify the potential gains or losses. And lastly, Lay all your stories on the table. Compare their delay costs. The ones bleeding the most value? They're your priority.
-
Suraksha Joshi
Digital Business Transformation | Agile Product Owner
Understanding the business value and financial impact of a story or feature is crucial. Even though it may seem straightforward to define the formula and calculate the numbers, it's essential to strategically plan the scope, value, risks of not implementing it, and the opportunities it creates. You need to consider both qualitative and quantitative KPIs to make the most accurate calculation of the Cost of Delay (CoD). By doing this, you can ensure the best decisions for your project's success and financial profitability.
To prioritize user stories based on cost of delay, you need to rank them according to their cost of delay divided by duration (CD3). This is a metric that measures the urgency of a user story, or how much value is lost per unit of time by delaying it. The higher the CD3, the higher the priority. To calculate CD3, you need to divide the cost of delay by the estimated duration of the user story. For example, if a user story has a cost of delay of $10,000 per month and an estimated duration of 2 weeks, its CD3 is $10,000 / (2/4) = $20,000 per month.
-
Arunav Tiwari
Product | AI/ML | IoT | AR/XR | The Product Folks
It's a precision tool that balances urgency with efficiency. A High CD3 scores screams 'do me first' Here's the tech breakdown: CD3 = Cost of Delay / Duration It's not just about speed; it's about smart acceleration. A user story with a high cost of delay but a long runway might still take a back seat to a quick win with immediate returns. It's a formula that would have saved my EV startup days of trial and error, aligning charging speeds with customer demand curves. In the edtech realm, where feature release can make or break a learning curve, CD3 prioritise what impacts learners today, not tomorrow. And in the volatile waves of Web-3, it's the difference between capitalizing on a trend or missing the blockchain boat.
-
🇵🇸 Mohamed Elsalamony
PL | Technical Lead | Scrum Master (ASM ®️)| Instructor| Mentor
- Cost of Delay refers to the economic impact of delaying a user story. This could be in terms of lost revenue, decreased customer satisfaction, or any other relevant metric. (Identify User Stories:List down all the user stories that need to be prioritized. Ensure that each user story is well-defined and represents a valuable piece of functionality from the user's perspective. -Estimate CoD: For each user story, estimate the potential cost of delay. Work closely with stakeholders, product owners, and subject matter experts to quantify the impact in monetary terms or other relevant metrics. (Compare CoD Across User Stories:Compare the estimated cost of delay for each user story. Identify which user stories have the highest cost of delay.
Utilizing cost of delay to prioritize user stories can provide you with a number of advantages, including aligning your priorities with business goals and customer needs, maximizing return on investment while minimizing the risk of waste, and balancing the trade-offs between short-term and long-term value. Furthermore, it can be used to effectively communicate the rationale and impact of your decisions to stakeholders, as well as facilitate adaptation to changing market conditions and customer feedback.
-
Shaker Samy
PD at Etisalat UAE | Certified PSM I | Agile Methodology | Project Management | Telecommunication | IT Management
By quantifying these costs and considering them in decision-making processes, organizations can make more informed choices about which projects to prioritize, and when to expedite or delay work.
-
Sonal Bahrani
Product Manager | TATA Communications | GlobalRapide | JAMVEE
By utilizing Cost of Delay, organizations offer their teams a transparent insight into the financial consequences of their efforts. This kind of awareness can inspire team members to give priority to their tasks, enhance their collaborative efforts, and assume responsibility for their work, recognizing that their contributions directly influence the financial success and profitability of the organization. This, in turn, fosters a more enthusiastic and driven workforce, an important element for achieving project success.
Using cost of delay to prioritize user stories can be challenging, such as estimating the value profile and delay sensitivity of each user story accurately and objectively. Additionally, dealing with uncertainty and variability in the value and duration of user stories, considering dependencies between user stories, and incorporating other factors, such as quality, technical debt, and strategic alignment into the prioritization process can be difficult. Moreover, managing the expectations and perceptions of stakeholders and team members should also be taken into consideration.
-
Nikhil Kabadi
Empowering Livelihood Education: VP Products @ ffreedom app | Growth Strategist & Product Leadership
In my B2B experience as part of PDI team, I realised that the relevance of the cost of delay isn't universal. For instance, in our enterprise subscription model, where clients continued to use features after release, the delay in delivering a feature wasn't tied to a one-time sale. Instead, it influenced recurring revenue. This allowed fine-tuning our solutions, avoiding hastily deploying half-baked features. Secondly, it shifted our focus towards nurturing recurring revenue rather than chasing sporadic one-time deals that appeared urgent, demanded many features, and put us in the forest calculating the short-term cost of delays. 'Delay' wasn't a roadblock; it was a calculated step ensuring sustained satisfaction and loyalty.
-
Nels (Kullah) Anderson
Head of Operations | Head of Global Customer Care | Mr. Get 'er dun | Strategy and Culture walk into a bar... | Strategic Alignment Expert | Data or die | VoC Champion
It is essential to ensure that the cost of delay receives only a portion of one's attention. By that, I mean that if the cost of delay takes more time and energy to plan, create, deploy, use, and improve, it will not be worth the effort. If the cost of delay becomes the focal point for the development organization, then it might lose sight of why it is there and what it is there to accomplish: good products that add value to people (who are willing to pay for them).
-
Arunav Tiwari
Product | AI/ML | IoT | AR/XR | The Product Folks
Beyond CD3, I think there are several key factors to weigh when prioritising user stories. Those are :- Risk, dependency, resource availability, stakeholder value, Business strategy, user impact, technical debt and the most important market trends. Agile methodology is multidimensional, it cannot be achieved by just first order thinking. We need to inculcate different mental models like the second and the third order thinking
(edited) -
Nels (Kullah) Anderson
Head of Operations | Head of Global Customer Care | Mr. Get 'er dun | Strategy and Culture walk into a bar... | Strategic Alignment Expert | Data or die | VoC Champion
The cost of delay is one factor to consider when prioritizing user stories. There are other considerations ranging from strategic importance to market perception to brand reputation and even to employee engagement that should also get a "seat at the prioritization table." One other thing to take into account is that sometimes we put time pressure on ourselves, and that can sometimes be "artificial." It is worth thinking about whether a user story would benefit from a deadline or whether it would benefit more greatly from getting it right. Don't let getting something done by a specific time be the end-all and be-all for a given user story.
(edited)