What are common mistakes in board recruitment?
Learn from the community’s knowledge. Experts are adding insights into this AI-powered collaborative article, and you could too.
This is a new type of article that we started with the help of AI, and experts are taking it forward by sharing their thoughts directly into each section.
If you’d like to contribute, request an invite by liking or reacting to this article. Learn more
— The LinkedIn Team
Board recruitment and succession are critical processes for any organization, but especially for those that rely on the strategic guidance and oversight of a board of directors. However, many boards make common mistakes that can undermine their effectiveness and impact. In this article, we will explore some of these mistakes and how to avoid them.
One of the most common mistakes in board recruitment is having a homogeneous board that lacks diversity in terms of gender, race, ethnicity, age, expertise, perspective, and experience. A diverse board can bring more creativity, innovation, and insight to the organization, as well as enhance its reputation and stakeholder engagement. To avoid this mistake, boards should adopt a diversity policy, conduct a board assessment, and use a variety of sources and methods to recruit diverse candidates.
-
Nuzee “Nusrat” Zahan
Let's create value & higher visibility for your organization together, Content Creator. Influencer. Communicator
In my country, the prevalent mistake is asking irrelevant questions during interviews and not thoroughly reviewing the CV. By avoiding these mistakes, the board enables interviewees to concentrate on their responses more effectively, while also assisting the board in pinpointing competitive candidates for the position in question.
25
-
John Buckley, Esq., P.E.
In-House Counsel with strong experience in Infrastructure Industries
In my experience as a member of non-profit boards and Board Secretary for different for-profit businesses, I would offer 3 suggestions: (1) have a couple independent board members who do not have a significant financial interest in the business; (2) have someone with a legal background, especially for SME, most especially if the SME doesn't have in-house counsel as part of management; (3) for LLC's, even solo LLC's, access the value of a board by including a board with well-defined powers in the operating agreement. Finally, for small businesses, don't assume the business can't afford independent board members. Independent board member advice, particularly from young Hi-Po's or near retirement execs, can be valuable and affordable.
18
Another common mistake in board recruitment is selecting candidates who are not a good fit for the organization's mission, vision, values, culture, and goals. A poor fit can lead to conflicts, misunderstandings, and dissatisfaction among board members and staff, as well as undermine the board's performance and accountability. To avoid this mistake, boards should clearly define the roles and expectations of board members, communicate the organization's identity and strategy, and use a rigorous screening and interviewing process to assess the fit of candidates.
-
Passant Hossam Saqr
Closing deals is my superpower! Business Development | Events Management | Growth Marketing | Account Management | Sales Coaching
One of the biggest mistakes in my opinion is rushing the recruitment process. This results in most of the mistakes we get to face later on like a poor fit, lack of diversity, etc. Taking the time to do a cultural assessment and identify the needs then evaluate potential board members thoroughly can minimize the risk of having members who doesn't align with culture and vision of the organization.
8
-
Leo Capelossi
Helping startups and scaleups to expand their teams across Europe and abroad 🌍
For a thriving startup ecosystem, selecting board members who align with the mission, culture, and goals is paramount. Misfits can lead to conflicts and hinder performance. To avoid this, defining roles, communicating identity, and rigorously screening candidates is essential for nurturing a harmonious startup environment.
3
A third common mistake in board recruitment is not having a succession plan for board leadership and key positions. A succession plan can help ensure continuity, stability, and smooth transitions in the board, as well as prepare the next generation of board leaders. Without a succession plan, boards may face gaps, crises, and losses of institutional knowledge and relationships. To avoid this mistake, boards should develop a succession policy, identify potential successors, and provide mentoring and training opportunities for them.
-
Leo Capelossi
Helping startups and scaleups to expand their teams across Europe and abroad 🌍
Failing to plan for board leadership and key positions is a frequent error. Succession planning ensures smooth transitions and prepares the next generation of leaders. Without it, boards face gaps and losses of knowledge and relationships. The remedy? Develop a succession policy, identify successors, and offer mentoring and training opportunities.
2
-
Roxci Bevis
Nonprofit Program Manager | Content & Copy Writer | Community Engagement Specialist
For sure an obstacle for many Boards! Something I've noticed often is Boards not making board recruitment a standing and active action item. Recruitment should be happening throughout the year, not just before the AGM, and many different recruitment approaches should be taken on by multiple board members. Boards really need to create a Board position or committee specifically for board recruitment and development.
2
A fourth common mistake in board recruitment is not providing adequate orientation and evaluation for new and existing board members. Orientation and evaluation can help board members understand their roles and responsibilities, learn about the organization and its stakeholders, develop their skills and competencies, and receive feedback and recognition for their contributions. Without orientation and evaluation, board members may feel confused, frustrated, or disengaged, and the board may miss opportunities to improve its governance and effectiveness. To avoid this mistake, boards should design and implement a comprehensive orientation and evaluation program for board members.
-
Leo Capelossi
Helping startups and scaleups to expand their teams across Europe and abroad 🌍
Overlooking orientation and evaluation for board members is a widespread misstep. These processes clarify roles, enhance understanding, and keep members engaged. Without them, confusion and missed opportunities can prevail. The solution? Implement a robust orientation and evaluation program to boost governance and effectiveness.
2
-
Colin W
Talent Acquisition Specialist | HR Consultant | Resume Writing Specialist | Martial Arts Sensi | Join my HR Newsletter
Neglecting board member orientation and evaluation is a critical mistake in recruitment. When new members join the board without proper orientation, they may struggle to understand their roles and responsibilities. Furthermore, without periodic evaluations, boards cannot gauge the effectiveness of their members. To address this, organizations should establish a comprehensive orientation process to bring new members up to speed. Regular evaluations help identify strengths and areas for improvement, fostering a more informed and efficient board. This ensures that board members are well-prepared and can contribute effectively to the organization's success.
1
A fifth common mistake in board recruitment is not having term limits for board members. Term limits can help ensure that the board has a healthy balance of continuity and renewal, as well as diversity and dynamism. Term limits can also prevent board members from becoming complacent, stagnant, or resistant to change, and encourage them to share their knowledge and experience with others. Without term limits, boards may face challenges in attracting new talent, fostering innovation, and adapting to changing environments. To avoid this mistake, boards should establish and enforce term limits for board members.
-
Charlotte Knutsen
Compliance Director at Falk
There are plenty of reasons to limit board tenure. However, one could also argue that a well-functioning long-term board of directors wields the power to meaningfully influence the purpose, culture, and direction of an organization, setting an appropriate long-term tone for both corporate management and shareholders, as well as ultimately driving long-term value creation by insulating management and the company as a whole from short-term market pressures.
4
-
Leo Capelossi
Helping startups and scaleups to expand their teams across Europe and abroad 🌍
Neglecting term limits for board members is a frequent misjudgment. Term limits maintain a balance of continuity and renewal, preventing complacency and encouraging diversity and innovation. Without them, boards may struggle to attract fresh talent and adapt to new landscapes. The solution? Enforce term limits for a dynamic and responsive board.
2
-
Shaharyar Mallick
Empowering individuals | IO Psychologist
I think that this really comes down to three items 1) They might have a pretty strong bias leading to wrongful decision making. If a board of directors was meeting over outstanding premium receivables, a director whose company was also amongst the list of defaulters may call it a simple 'Industry norm' even if the outstanding receivables amount UpTo 40% of annual business. 2) People maybe a hotshot in the market, but they have 0 experience in the industry. For an out of the industry suggestion they might work, but having these people serve as chairmen of any board based committees would be a stretch. 3) Boards with people who really can't make decisions, or just can't delegate, and even worse, don't really care.
(edited)5
-
Márcio Luiz Lima de Souza 📲📊
Idealizador da Health EdTech Dr On | Startup | Mentoria em Health Business | Estratégias na Saúde
Organizações têm objetivos; pessoas têm aspirações. Quanto mais próximas essas variáveis estiverem, mais chance de acertar nas contratações