What are common mistakes when creating remote troubleshooting documentation?
Learn from the community’s knowledge. Experts are adding insights into this AI-powered collaborative article, and you could too.
This is a new type of article that we started with the help of AI, and experts are taking it forward by sharing their thoughts directly into each section.
If you’d like to contribute, request an invite by liking or reacting to this article. Learn more
— The LinkedIn Team
Remote troubleshooting documentation is a vital resource for network administrators who need to assist users or clients with technical issues over the internet. However, creating clear and effective documentation can be challenging, especially when dealing with complex or unfamiliar scenarios. In this article, we will discuss some common mistakes that network administrators make when creating remote troubleshooting documentation, and how to avoid them.
One of the most common mistakes when creating remote troubleshooting documentation is being vague or ambiguous about the problem, the solution, or the steps involved. This can lead to confusion, frustration, or errors for the users or clients who are following the instructions. To avoid this, you should always define the problem clearly, explain the expected outcome, and provide detailed and specific steps that are easy to follow. You should also use simple and consistent language, avoid jargon or acronyms, and provide screenshots or diagrams if possible.
-
Ira Friedwald
Retired
Consider who the end user is, what is their background, do they have technical savvy to understand the instructions you send them? I always take into account the end user’s background and knowledge base for the equipment they will be working with. I also would try and talk with the remote user and work with them, going through the instructions step by step, doing it myself with a test device, walking them through to success.
(edited)9
-
Ishaq Mohammed
Problem Solver, Creative Solutions builder, Technology Mapping Specialist, Managed Services
Inadequate Documentation: causes confusion and delays. Insufficient Training: Results in ineffective troubleshooting and miscommunication among support staff. Poor Communication: Leads to misunderstandings and prolonged resolution. Ignoring Security: Exposes sensitive data to risks when security isn't a priority in remote troubleshooting. Overcomplicated or Inconsistent Processes: Complex, inconsistent procedures confuse remote staff. Neglecting User Experience: Focusing solely on technical aspects can leave customers dissatisfied. To create an effective remote troubleshooting process, prioritize training, clear documentation, communication, and security while maintaining a user-centric approach.
8
-
Bijan Mosavat
PSP Auditor at Shaparak
The most crucial consideration when working remotely is the limited access to controls. For instance, you might not be able to restart the system manually, disconnect power, or start it manually when shut down.
3
Another common mistake when creating remote troubleshooting documentation is having a poor or inconsistent structure. This can make the documentation hard to read, navigate, or understand. To avoid this, you should always organize your documentation into logical sections, headings, and subheadings, and use a consistent format and style throughout. You should also use numbered or bulleted lists, tables, or charts to present information in a clear and concise way. You should also use
tags for code blocks or commands, and highlight any important or critical information.
###### Lack of testing
A third common mistake when creating remote troubleshooting documentation is not testing the instructions before publishing or sharing them. This can result in errors, inconsistencies, or omissions that can affect the quality and reliability of the documentation. To avoid this, you should always test your documentation on different devices, platforms, or environments, and verify that the instructions work as intended. You should also check for spelling, grammar, or formatting errors, and update your documentation regularly to reflect any changes or feedback.
###### Lack of feedback
A fourth common mistake when creating remote troubleshooting documentation is not seeking or incorporating feedback from the users or clients who are using the documentation. This can lead to gaps, inaccuracies, or irrelevance in the documentation. To avoid this, you should always solicit feedback from your target audience, and ask them about their experience, satisfaction, or suggestions. You should also monitor the usage, performance, and impact of your documentation, and use metrics or analytics to measure its effectiveness and improvement.
###### Lack of accessibility
A fifth common mistake when creating remote troubleshooting documentation is not considering the accessibility or usability of the documentation for different users or clients. This can lead to barriers, difficulties, or frustrations for the users or clients who have different needs, preferences, or abilities. To avoid this, you should always follow the best practices and standards for web accessibility, and ensure that your documentation is compatible with different browsers, devices, or screen readers. You should also use clear and readable fonts, colors, and contrast, and provide alternative text, captions, or transcripts for images, videos, or audio.
######Here’s what else to consider
This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?
-
Muhammad Imtiaz
Lead Information Security Consultant | CQI and IRCA Certified ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (ISMS) | Securing Critical Assets | Certified OT/ICS Cybersecurity Professional
Not considering the end user's background and knowledge base is a common mistake when creating remote troubleshooting documentation. This can lead to frustration and confusion for the user, as they may not understand the instructions or the technical jargon used. It is important to tailor the documentation to the user's level of expertise, and to provide additional information and resources if needed. Avoid using technical jargon and acronyms, or explain them clearly if they must be used. Provide step-by-step instructions with screenshots or diagrams if necessary. Break down complex tasks into smaller steps. Offer troubleshooting tips for common problems. Provide links to additional resources, such as online tutorials or help forums.
4
-
Bob Coppedge
Daily video poster, author of 3 books, Popular speaker, Crotchety Old Geek, Co-Managed IT services guru, fluent translator of IT to Biz and back again.
3 Sins of IT documentation: 1> Lack of Getting to It Organizations (and people) often delay the documentation (especially in the SMB world) as a "necessary evil". 2> It's written to be correct, not understood IT documentation is often written with the goal of being accurate (especially if written by IT technical folks). IT people often suffer from a focus on being accurate first, with being understood a far second place. Which is why our documentation suffers, and why we don't get invited to cool parties. 3> It's not goal based Often the only thing a person wants to do is to accomplish a specific task (ie, "I just want to connect"). But the documentation is written to cover the entire gamut, making it difficult at best to use.
3
-
Rudy Kallis
Senior Server Engineer @ British American Tobacco South Africa (PTY) via Datacentrix | MCSE, ChatGPT Expert
Addressing the lack of structure in remote troubleshooting documentation requires a multi-faceted strategy. 1. Factual Approach: Use a standardized template for consistency. 2. Emotional Intelligence: Make the content intuitive to ease user stress. 3. Critical Thinking: Anticipate and prevent user errors with clear warnings. 4. Positive Rationality: Highlight the empowerment well-structured guides provide. 5. Creative Thinking: Incorporate creative formats, like interactive aids and AI chatbots for dynamic guidance. 6. Process Management: Establish a review process for ongoing refinement, based on user feedback and analytics. This will ensure that the documentation evolves with user needs and technological advancements.
1